By Jeremy Schwartz, Executive Vice President, Global Head of Research, WisdomTree
Increasing portfolio quality is a theme many investors flock to during recessions.
You might worry that rotation and flows to quality strategies push up valuations to premium prices, hurting the prospects of forward-looking returns. But WisdomTree has a potential solution. We have a family of quality dividend growth strategies that combine elements of screening for profitability (high return on equity (ROE) and return on assets (ROA)) and strong earnings growth expectations.
Because of the profitability focus and the dividend requirement, one of the interesting parts of our U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) is that it is trading at price-to-earnings (P/E) multiples that resemble the characteristics of “value” sides of the market, but with significantly higher quality ratios.
While the S&P 500 Value Index has a return on equity of 9.4%—below the S&P 500 level of 13.1%—DGRW has an ROE of more than 24%.
Please click here for standardized and the most recent month-end performance.
For definitions of terms in the table, please visit our glossary.
Let’s look at some of the nuance of this strategy.
Dividends Under Pressure
The broad universe of value strategies and dividend-paying stocks has come under pressure in 2020 as many companies were forced to scale back or cut their dividends.
Less Likely to Cut Dividends: Whereas 272 companies, or 13%, of the 1,471 dividend payers in the WisdomTree U.S. Dividend Index either cut or suspended dividends in 2020, less than 8% of the 300 companies in the WisdomTree Quality Dividend Growth Index cut or suspended dividends in 2020.
Quality More Likely to Grow Dividends: Quality companies also tend to be able to grow dividends faster over time, and they were stress-tested during this pandemic. Whereas 54% of the broad universe of 1,471 dividend payers have grown their dividends in 2020, 64% of the Quality Dividend Growth Index have.
Being less likely to cut dividends and more likely to grow them adds up. The WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index currently only sees a decline of less than 2% in its total Dividend Stream®, whereas the broad index Dividend Stream is down 6.5%.
Total Change in Dividend Stream by Dividend Action in 2020
2020 Factor Returns—Low Risk Lags
In recent years, investors have flocked to “low-risk” funds that track indexes like the MSCI USA Minimum Volatility and the S&P 500 Low Volatility—adding $36.5 billion to such funds between 2017 and 20191.
But these strategies haven’t been a ballast during the coronavirus storm. The MSCI USA Minimum Volatility lagged the S&P 500 by 7.1% this year. The S&P Low Volatility has lagged by more than 12%.
For definitions of terms in the chart, please visit our glossary.
Growth strategies, led by technology shares that benefited from the economic shutdown, have dominated all other factors, with a more than 3,000 basis point (bps) spread between growth and value.
Remarkably, the WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index only trailed the S&P 500 by 170 bps this year without holding 7 of the 10 largest contributors to S&P 500 performance—many of the non-dividend-paying technology stocks.
For investors concerned about the top-heavy, growth-led run in the broad benchmark, our quality dividend growth strategy—which combines elements of quality and value—looks like an attractive alternative for widespread uncertainty and market volatility.
Originally published by WisdomTree, 10/9/20
1Jason Zweig, “Some Investors Tried to Win by Losing Less. They Lost Anyway,” Wall Street Journal, 9/18/20.
Important Risks Related to this Article
There are risks associated with investing, including possible loss of principal. Funds focusing their investments on certain sectors increase their vulnerability to any single economic or regulatory development. This may result in greater share price volatility. Please read the Fund’s prospectus for specific details regarding the Fund’s risk profile.
Read more on ETFtrends.com.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.