The ultimate fate of Transocean (RIG) shareholders may be determined in the next two months. That determination may have little to do with the economy or supply and demand in the off-shore drilling market. Instead, it will depend on legal analysis of a few indenture provisions.

Exchange Transactions

This is the situation Transocean finds itself in after entering into exchange transactions to reduce its outstanding debt amount and extend its debt maturities in an effort to stave off bankruptcy. In response to the exchange offer, Whitebox Advisors LLC and other owners of Transocean’s so-called “priority guarantee notes,” which are structurally senior to the company’s other unsecured notes, have sued Transocean to challenge the consummation of the exchange offer, arguing that the exchange offer, and the reorganization necessary for it, constitute a default under the indentures governing the priority guarantee notes.

Transocean has requested that the court hear its motion for summary judgment prior to December 1, 2020, which is the date that the cure period for the alleged default would expire. The challenging funds own more than 25% of one of the series of notes, the threshold for accelerating upon an Event of Default. These funds have delivered Transocean a notice that would automatically accelerate if the alleged default is not cured by December 1st, which is the end of the cure period. As a practical matter, Transocean cannot cure the alleged default as that would require undoing the exchange transaction. As such, Transocean’s only hope of avoiding bankruptcy at this stage is either (i) to win summary judgment from the court denying Whitebox’s claim that the transaction constituted a default or (ii) settle with the funds, in each case prior to December 1st.

The Alleged Default

The actual claim of default is quite interesting. Whitebox

  • We asked five CEOs, at companies including Skillshare and Hired, why they decided to get rid of their office space.
  • The CEOs said their employees want greater flexibility — and there are better ways to spend money than on rent.
  • Some companies are ramping up hiring or giving employees stipends to set up their home offices.
  • Visit Business Insider’s homepage for more stories.

Rent is expensive. And potentially unnecessary.

Since March, offices around the world have been eerily silent, as the folks who normally fill them have been isolating from the coronavirus at home. Many employers have responded by cutting their real-estate costs.

A Reuters analysis of quarterly earnings calls during a week in July found that more than 25 large companies intend to downsize their office space in the coming year. Business Insider’s Daniel Geiger reported that a growing number of employers — including Macy’s and Yelp — are subleasing their office space.

Some businesses have decided to pull the plug, trading office space for cyberspace for the foreseeable future. For companies that have been hit hard by the recession, it’s an obvious place to reduce spending — especially if employees have been just as effective out of their boss’ sight.

Business Insider spoke to five CEOs in a range of industries who opted to ditch their offices during the pandemic. We asked them how they arrived at this decision, where they’re saving money, and what kinds of challenges they’ve run into. All these companies have fewer than 200 employees, so the transition to remote work might be easier for them than for large corporations.

Read on for the executives’ insights.

Responses have been edited for length and clarity.

Mehul Patel, CEO of Hired

mehul patel hired

Mehul Patel is the CEO of Hired.

Courtesy of Hired

What the company does: Matches